Watch Dogs 2 will “carry on taking risks” says Ubisoft | gamesTM - Official Website

Watch Dogs 2 will “carry on taking risks” says Ubisoft

Hacking_WD_WiiU_20141118_6pmCET_1416332381

Creating new gaming IP is a risky businesses but, with just one game to beat, surely creating a sequel to a successful debut should be easy. It shouldn’t, says Watch Dogs’ creative director Jonathan Morin

What was the point of Ubisoft’s cyber-noir epic Watch Dogs? Why did creative director Jonathan Morin and his team spend five years slaving away on this open world action-adventure, capturing images of Chicago, working on eight-player co-op and creating accomplished hacker Aiden Pearce?

If it was to achieve stunning success as a game then its glowing reviews (including a 9/10 by this very magazine), 8 million sales and a role in helping the French publisher rake in a staggering £387 million in its first quarter results for 2014 has been vindication of all of the team’s hard work.

Jonathan Morin-2_1
Jonathan Morin, Watch Dogs creative director

But if its main purpose was to establish a brand and a “promise” for the future – “The challenge when we made the first game was to create something that would make people dream about something else”, says Morin – then it has over-achieved. For there is no doubting the high expectation now on the development team to deliver a very special sequel, and that will require Morin and his team to be at the top of their game.

“When you start a new project [and new IP], it’s a blank page and everything you do is what you want to do,” he says. “With a sequel, there is more pressure to push a brand forward and we now have to appeal to fans in a new way.” In order to do this, Morin insists Watch Dogs will continue to take risks. “You have to carry on taking risks”, he asserts. “I will not do this job if there is no risk in it, that would just be boring. You shouldn’t prevent yourself from trying something just because it’s hard and the solution is not apparent.”

WD_S_VIP_MOTORCYCLE_STEAMPIPE_1920x1080_1394724811

Morin already has some plans. Although he says it is too early to go into intricate detail about them, he wants players to continue creating their own stories using features like the Profiler. He also wants his team to refrain from filling in too many narrative gaps. “We want to allow them to play with a very different state of mind, not wrap up concepts for them.” He talks about expanding on the alternate realities, “players loved the idea of other players who create an alternate reality in their games and knowing that now opens up a lot of new possibilities of what online can do.” More than that, he wants to reassess everything about Watch Dogs, including the ideas that were originally dismissed, and reconsider them again. Everything is back on the table.

It is all part of a strategy to help Watch Dogs sit alongside Ubisoft’s other classics such as Assassin’s Creed and Far Cry, while steering clear of the sequel becoming an industry calamity of Devil May Cry 2 and Duke Nukem Forever proportions. By moving his team away from a mindset of simply creating more of the same – a temptation when the original was so well received – Morin says the game will be hugely challenging not only for gamers but for his own development team.
“We have to give them something hard to do”, he says. “If we don’t, they could fade out, which means you don’t benefit from their knowledge or they will leave. Our team is really assimilated with the challenge we have and who knows where it will lead us next.”

WD_S_SIGNATURE_PACK_GOLD_1920x1080_1404230888

This approach is by no means unusual but neither is it widespread in the industry. Successful sequel makers such as Naughty Dog understand that each follow-up has to be built upon and improved. They avoid looking at healthy sales as a barometer for a “business as usual” approach and they take feedback and criticism on board. For successful sequel creators, the process is not just about fixing flaws but seeing the debut game with a fresh pair of eyes.

“I don’t think Watch Dogs is perfect in any way and there’s a lot of room for improvement”, Morin readily admits. “But you don’t always see this when you ship a game. We deliver what we believe the brand should be at the time. But afterward, when you cool down after five and a half years [of development] and take your vacations and people play the game, certain elements become clear. They let you continue to bring what you envision to the next level with the fans included this time, which is where I think it really gets interesting.”

To identify how much work really needs to be done, Morin continues to visit forums and read reviews as well as talk to fans in person. “I have four kids at school and their friends tell us what they like and don’t like about the game”, he says. And he is relishing it. “The new pressure is almost like a privilege”, he says. “If you are making a game with pressure, then you’re making a game people care about. And people care about Watch Dogs.”

Get the latest on Ubisoft’s next round of games like The Division and Rainbow Six: Siege in games™ 156 on sale now

More from the Web



There are 19 comments

Add yours
  1. Bonsky

    I agree with this part.

    “The challenge when we made the first game was to create something that
    would make people dream about something else”, says Morin – then it has
    over-achieved

    It made me dream that I could be playing a much better game.

  2. joe

    “If you are making a game with pressure, then you’re making a game people care about. And people care about Watch Dogs.” No they really don’t care. And you’re making a game with pressure because you have a job of making out of shit.

  3. dapaintrain

    Some how reading this i get the feeling that he believes he managed to beat gtav in terms of quality… Tell him he’s dreaming.

    Go into any game store that takes trade ins and watch dogs will be flooding the shelves used games section and on eBay it’s selling so low it’s not even worth it anymore.

    You can’t even sell it for what a normal ps4 launch game would fetch

  4. spideynut71

    You’re taking a risk buying Ubisoft games…..especially if you’re dumb enough to pre-order and buy them Day-1. From now on, I’ll only be buying their games used at Gamestop, so I’ll have an entire week to play the game, then return it for a full refund if I’m done with it, or it sucks. Ubi won’t see a penny from me, unless there’s some must-have DLC I want….which very rarely happens.

  5. catkid133

    Why is everyone hating on watch dogs? I personally loved the game’s story line and content much more then some other games mentioned like GTA 5. However if they plan on incorporating multiplayer in the story line of watchdogs 2 there’s an issue. Multiplayer lagged the hell out of me in watchdogs 1, and caused severe issues, it would not be a very good idea to do that, or just fix the damn multiplayer….

  6. UBIsucks!

    Oh no! This sucks! Not again!!! So that means we will be getting WD2, FC5 & AC 7. All of them with similar side quest/games. Same unlock towers, same side quest & same treasure chest/collectables all over the map. The only difference will be AC in early times, WD in modern times & FC in 1st person.

  7. Pay4Quality

    Pre-ordered AC:U, FC4 and WD none of which were disappointment. You are just a poor kid who can’t admit the fact and hides within lies of “The games just suck”.

    AC:U had bad performance but ran pretty well on my computer. FC4 was just pure awesomeness. WD was so hyped that I expected more from it but it was still a damn good game.

  8. spideynut71

    “Poor kid”? LOL…um, NO. Got both PS4 and X1 , DAY ONE, and built my own custom PC for multiplatform games. Just because someone doesn’t want to support a shltty dev/publisher, doesn’t mean they’re “poor”. I guess you run out and buy every COD and Madden the day it releases as well, since you love to throw $$ at dishonest, money-grubbing publishers.
    And yeah, FC4 is awesome…and I got it free with my EVGA 780ti Classified. 🙂


Post a new comment

Follow us on Twitter